Why AI development demands product operating models

Many of us have built products inside a classic "project" mindset: "You've got three months—build these unvalidated product ideas! We'll launch leveraging our brand, and everyone will love it!"

Then reality strikes. Features get slashed, priorities shift to whoever shouts loudest in sales, and the launch fizzles. The product sits dormant until the next funding cycle resurrects it for another attempt at global dominance. Some team members return; others move on. It feels like day one again.

Previously, you could afford minimal maintenance between cycles. But in the era of AI, the problem escalates rapidly: machine learning models deteriorate, data drifts, and APIs constantly evolve—introducing a new and costly category of tech debt.

It doesn't have to be this way. If you want a meaningful return on your AI investments, it's crucial to break this cycle now.

Product operating models represent a fundamental organizational shift that delivers measurable competitive advantage. Companies achieving high maturity show 60% greater total returns to shareholders and 16% higher operating margins than traditional project-based approaches.

This comprehensive transformation from feature factories to customer-centric, outcome-driven organizations has evolved from manufacturing principles and agile methodologies into the dominant organizational framework for digital-era success. Fortune 200 companies implementing these models report dramatic improvements: Microsoft achieved 60% reduction in manual work and 20% faster feature delivery, while JPMorgan Chase generated $1.5 billion in business value from AI-enabled product operations. The evidence demonstrates that product operating models are not merely a management trend but a business imperative for sustained competitive advantage in digital technology, and are evolving to a must-have in the age of AI.

Organizations aiming to deliver AI-enabled software thrive when they adopt a disciplined product operating model; empirical evidence shows that omitting this foundation exposes AI initiatives to a high risk of failure.

From brand management to digital transformation

But first, let’s go all the way back to 1931, when the concept of the product operating model was first introduced, when Neil McElroy's "Brand Men" memo at Procter & Gamble established the first product management role, creating dedicated managers responsible for individual product lines' success. The act was a signal of change as it marked the initial shift from purely functional organization to product-centric responsibility structures.

The foundation expanded through Toyota's Production System in the late 1940s, which introduced Kanban methodology and lean manufacturing principles emphasizing customer-driven production and waste elimination. These concepts provided the operational framework that would later influence modern product development practices.

The digital revolution catalyzed formal adoption in the early 2000s. The Agile Manifesto of 2001 established core principles that became fundamental to product operating models: individuals and interactions over processes, working software over documentation, customer collaboration over contracts, and responding to change over following plans. Companies like Google, Amazon, and Netflix demonstrated successful product-centric organizational models, while thought leaders like Eric Ries codified these approaches through the Lean Startup methodology in 2008.

How product operating models actually work

Product operating models function through three interconnected pillars: product strategy (how organizations decide which problems to solve), product discovery (how teams determine the best solutions), and product delivery (how solutions are built and deployed). Unlike traditional project-based approaches focused on delivering predetermined features, these models organize around solving customer problems and achieving measurable business outcomes.

The organizational structure centers on cross-functional product teams of 8-12 people including product managers, designers, and engineers (and now data scientists if you are building AI) who own end-to-end customer experiences. These durable teams operate with significant autonomy within strategic guardrails, empowered to make decisions about how to achieve their assigned outcomes. Platform teams provide reusable services and infrastructure to multiple product teams, while service teams handle operational excellence and compliance requirements.

The measurement philosophy emphasizes outcome metrics over output metrics. Instead of tracking features delivered or projects completed, organizations focus on customer satisfaction scores, business value generated, and user engagement metrics. This fundamental shift from "what did we build" to "what problem did we solve" drives different behaviors and decision-making throughout the organization.

Amazon Prime exemplifies the three-pillar approach that transformed the company's e-commerce business. When Amazon identified that shipping costs and delays were the primary barriers to customer convenience, they organized around solving this core problem through their product operating model framework.

• Product Strategy (Deciding which problems to solve): Amazon's leadership used customer data to identify that convenience was significantly limited by shipping—both cost and service quality. Rather than spreading resources across multiple initiatives, they made shipping a multi-year strategic focus. The product vision was clear: dramatically improve customer convenience through shipping innovation.
• Product Discovery (Determining the best solutions): Cross-functional teams attacked two major areas: reducing time from "Buy" click to shipper handoff, and improving delivery speed and reliability. Teams conducted extensive experimentation to understand customer behavior, testing different shipping models, pricing strategies, and service levels. They discovered that customers would pay an annual fee for unlimited fast shipping, validating the subscription model concept.
• Product Delivery (Building and deploying solutions): Empowered product teams built and tested solutions continuously, with learnings rapidly flowing back to product leaders and CEO Jeff Bezos. Teams deployed iterative improvements to fulfillment systems, logistics networks, and customer interfaces. The experimental results gave leadership confidence to pursue an even bolder vision than originally imagined.

The results were transformational. Amazon Prime became one of the most financially successful product innovations in history, fundamentally changing customer behavior and creating a sustainable competitive advantage. The subscription model generated massive customer loyalty while providing predictable revenue streams.

Traditional project management isn’t a digital solution

Traditional projects work like building a house. You create detailed blueprints upfront, follow a linear sequence of building the foundation, then construct the framing, then the roofing, and so forth, and you measure success by delivering what was planned on time, under budget and how well you adhered to the blueprint. The “iron triangle” of time, cost, and scope optimization fails when customer needs evolve continuously and competitive advantage requires constant innovation.

The temporary nature of digital project teams means that when issues arise or new opportunities emerge, there's no one with long-term ownership to address them. Most critically, project success metrics completely miss what actually matters in digital: whether customers adopt the solution, whether it solves real problems, and whether it creates sustainable business value. This fundamental misalignment between project management assumptions and digital reality explains why so many digital transformation initiatives deliver impressive project completion rates while failing to achieve their intended business outcomes, which also creates internal conflict in an organization. The project leader considers the project a success, but the business leader fails to get a return on the money invested.

Operating a project model on a digital product is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Customer needs evolve continuously as they interact with products, while technical possibilities expand rapidly with new tools and platforms. The most valuable solutions often emerge through experimentation rather than planning. When organizations force digital initiatives through project frameworks, they create artificial constraints that prevent the iterative discovery essential for breakthrough innovations. Teams become focused on delivering the originally planned features rather than solving the underlying customer problems, leading to products that technically meet specifications but fail to create meaningful value.

Why AI and emerging technologies demand product models

But now, even the project timelines are becoming disrupted with evolving technology. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and quantum computing represent fundamentally different technological paradigms that cannot be successfully managed through traditional project-based approaches. Unlike conventional software development with predictable requirements and linear progress, AI initiatives require continuous experimentation, rapid hypothesis testing, and adaptive machine learning cycles that align perfectly with product operating model principles.

Harvard Business Review research reveals that AI project failure rates reach as high as 80%—almost double the rate of traditional corporate IT project failures. The elevated failure rate reflects the inherent tension between project management's emphasis on fixed timelines, predetermined deliverables, and linear progress tracking, where every AI release demands new accuracy tests, bias audits, and stress scenarios.

Statistical drift steadily erodes predictions, forcing scheduled retraining, feature refresh, and ongoing monitoring to preserve value. When organizations attempt to force AI initiatives into conventional project frameworks, they create constraints that prevent the iterative discovery essential for breakthrough innovations, leading to misaligned expectations, insufficient experimentation frameworks, and inability to adapt to emerging insights during development.

Why AI development functions more like continuous discovery than project delivery

AI development mirrors product discovery methodologies in fundamental ways. Machine learning models require continuous training data evaluation, performance metric optimization, and user behavior analysis—exactly the customer-centric, outcome-driven approaches that product teams excel at executing. The iterative nature of algorithm improvement, A/B testing of model performance, and rapid deployment cycles align naturally with product operating model practices rather than waterfall project management.

Cross-functional collaboration becomes mission-critical for AI success. Effective AI initiatives require domain experts, data scientists, machine learning engineers, product managers, and business stakeholders working in integrated teams. Traditional project approaches create handoffs and silos that break the feedback loops essential for AI model development and deployment.

Quantum computing amplifies these requirements exponentially. Quantum algorithms exist in probabilistic states requiring continuous calibration and real-time adaptation. The experimental nature of quantum development demands organizational agility that only product thinking can provide.

The organisational renaissance

The evidence demonstrates that artificial intelligence development requires organizational approaches fundamentally different from traditional project management. The 80% failure rate reflects a deeper truth: AI succeeds when organizations embrace experimentation, consistent collaboration, and outcome-driven measurement.

Forward-thinking organizations are already making this transition. They're restructuring teams around customer outcomes, implementing platform thinking for shared AI infrastructure, developing measurement systems that track business value creation, and building the continuous experimentation capabilities that AI requires.

Here are three things you can do to get started:

1. Secure leadership buy-in by demonstrating AI value through measurable pilot projects tied directly to strategic business goals.
2. Develop and implement training programs focused on AI product management skills to enable teams to adopt experimentation-based workflows.
3. Redesign internal success metrics and incentives to reward teams for achieving business outcomes through iterative, customer-centric AI development.

The transformation demands sustained leadership commitment and cultural evolution. Organizations must embrace outcome achievement over task completion, customer value creation over functional optimization, and adaptive learning over rigid planning.

The question isn't whether your organization will eventually adopt product operating models for AI. It's whether you'll make the transition before it’s too late.

Read more great content on Mind the Product

AI and Product Strategy – Andrew Martinez-Fonts (VP Product, Honeysales)

Voice takes centre stage in AI race while OpenAI loses battle for Windsurf: this week’s news roundup

Building an AI-first company culture in SaaS and fintech