Why it feels like you're falling behind on AI - Barry O'Reilly (Author, and Founder of Nobody Studios)

Written by

The Product Experience
The Product Experience

Join our podcast hosts Lily Smith and Randy Silver for in-depth conversations with some of the best product people around the world! Every week they chat with people in the know, covering the topics that matter to you - solving real problems, developing awesome products, building successful teams and developing careers. Find out more, subscribe, and access all episodes on The Product Experience homepage.

Barry O'Reilly – Decision Velocity, Judgment, and Why AI Transformations Fail | The Product Experience

Barry O'Reilly is an entrepreneur, author, and founder of Nobody Studios — an early-stage venture studio building AI companies. Over six years he has worked alongside founders, executives, and enterprise leadership teams to rethink how organisations operate in the age of generative AI, while simultaneously launching companies inside the studio model.

A former startup advisor and executive coach, Barry has spent the last several years studying why most AI transformations fail despite enormous investment. Through coaching and advisory work with leaders at American Airlines, Skyscanner, and Slack, he has developed practical frameworks for improving decision-making, reducing administrative overhead, and increasing what he calls "decision velocity."

In this episode, Barry explains why AI adoption collapses when companies focus on tools instead of behaviour change, why judgment is becoming the most important human skill in an automated world, and how teams can use AI to improve collaboration rather than quietly replace the people doing the work.

Chapters

1:03 Building AI companies at Nobody Studios
3:16 Why AI transformations fail
5:05 The danger of focusing on tools
6:35 Discovering natural workflows with AI
8:51 Turning conversations into data assets
12:02 Measuring successful AI adoption
13:14 Why leaders must role-model behaviour change
18:39 Decision velocity as a leadership metric
21:33 Escaping administrative overload
23:02 Why leaders need time to think
26:54 What CFOs are worried about
28:08 Can AI replace startup teams?
29:45 Why distribution still matters most
33:13 Capturing and synthesising ideas with AI
34:38 Using AI to challenge your thinking
37:11 Avoiding top-down AI-driven strategy
39:00 Why teams plus AI outperform individuals
42:31 The problem with AI-generated certainty
43:12 Preserving human judgment
44:55 Hiring for judgment and decision-making
47:19 Final reflections on leadership and AI

Key Takeaways

Tools don't change organisations — behaviours do

Most AI transformations fail because companies install software and expect the way people work to follow. Without changing how teams make decisions and collaborate, the tools remain inert.

Find where AI fits your natural way of working

The most effective AI use cases amplify an existing strength rather than impose a new workflow. Barry discovered he produced better writing by talking through ideas and using transcription, not by forcing himself into traditional writing habits.

Every conversation is a data asset

Capturing meetings, decisions, and discussions as structured data creates long-term organisational intelligence. Each interaction becomes a reusable asset that improves preparation, follow-through, and future decision-making.

Leaders must model the behaviour they want to see

Organisations see better outcomes when executives openly experiment with AI, share lessons learned, and create psychological safety around adoption. If leaders opt out, the rest of the organisation takes note.

Decision velocity is more valuable than raw productivity

The metric that matters is how fast teams arrive prepared, make decisions, reduce reversals, and redirect time away from administration toward meaningful problems. Speed of good decisions is a competitive advantage.

Use AI to pressure-test thinking, not replace it

The most valuable prompts ask for blind spots, alternative scenarios, and counterarguments rather than definitive answers. AI should challenge your reasoning, not simply confirm it.

Teams working with AI outperform individuals working with AI

Research shows that collaborative ideation with AI produces significantly stronger outcomes than isolated use. The combination of human diversity and AI capability is more powerful than either alone.

Productivity gains are only valuable if they create space for thought

If efficiency simply generates more exhaustion, nothing improves. The real opportunity is using reclaimed time for reflection, slow thinking, and better judgment — not filling it with more output.

Judgment is the capability you cannot outsource

When people stop exercising judgment and defer entirely to AI-generated answers, they gradually erode their ability to make decisions under uncertainty. Preserving that capacity requires deliberate, repeated practice.

Did you find this article helpful?

Rate this article to help us improve

Your unfair advantage in product, delivered weekly.

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms & Privacy Policy

Join 170k+ product pros

Become a better product manager
Learn from product experts and become part of the world’s most engaged community for product managers
Join the community

Free Resources

  • Articles

Popular Content

Company
  • Careers

    HIRING

Follow us
  • LinkedIn

© 2026 Pendo.io, Inc. All rights reserved. Pendo trademarks, product names, logos and other marks and designs are trademarks of Pendo.io, Inc. or its subsidiaries and may not be used without permission.